THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE INNOVATION OF ETF GROWTH
Last week, the Toroso Research team attended Inside ETFs in Hollywood, Florida. Close to 3,000 ETF Nerds gathered to discuss ETF industry trends, growth, and challenges. In early 2018, the equity and crypto market euphoria set a dystopian tone at the conference, which we chronicled in last year’s coverage: Fear and Loathing in Hollywood, Florida. In 2019, the tone is different. Although ETF growth has become a self-fulfilling prophecy, there has been sobering recognition of industry competition and revenue challenges.
GROWTH IS GOOD
The conference began on Sunday February 10th with one of our favorite panels on “How to Launch an ETF” with our friend Chris Sullivan as moderator. For a Sunday afternoon, the attendance for this panel was surprisingly robust and with only standing room available for late comers. The conversation inevitably moved from “How to Launch” to “How to Grow an ETF”. Panelist Charles Ragauss referenced our affiliated company, Tidal ETF Services, which helps companies launch and grow ETFs.
Additionally on the growth front, David Nadig and Matt Hougan shared that the date when ETF assets will surpass mutual fund assets is closer than they originally predicted. The chart below now assumes ETF assets to reign supreme by 2024.
THE REVENUE CHALLENGE
Despite all the growth, this year there was a strong recognition of the challenges present in the ETF industry. With fees continuing to decline, concentration in sponsor assets and gatekeepers becoming even more strict, it appears the industry has matured and become truly competitive. This year, new entrants have become realistic about their “hot new idea” and incumbents like Blackrock had a severely muted presence. Many of these challenges are good for investors, but will force the ETF industry to innovate to remain profitable.
Over the last 25 years, the ETF structure has represented a fintech solution to many of the inefficiencies of the financial services industry. At this year’s conference, the fintech entrepreneurs returned. During the conference we met companies like Say.com who are looking to change the proxy process and promote share holder engagement. Also, companies like Sofi.com that have revolutionized student loan refinancing are looking to launch financial services platforms. Even David Nadig and Matt Hougan asked in their main speech “What’s next?” for the ETF technology.
Ironically, the answer they proposed was a return to separately managed accounts with a twist. The twist is mass customization, which they called “direct indexing”. This concept is actually not new, our TETF index committee members, Kevin Carter and Burton Malkiel, pioneered this concept almost 20 years ago with a company called Active Index Advisors. The theory is that through the use of technology, each of us can invest in our custom portfolio as easily as we can by an ETF today. So what changed to make this seasoned idea viable again? The technology that allows ETFs to provide liquidity, transparency and low cost has become so efficient that soon it will be able to be implemented on a micro level. The same companies within the ETF ecosystem which drive client alignment can and are powering the move toward custom indexing.
THE KEY TO THE TREASURE, IS THE TREASURE
In summary, ETFs are growing, but the traditional revenue models are changing. The fintech solution of the ETF is evolving and the next phase of growth will likely come from innovation. The greatest challenge to that growth is not embracing disruption and customization. Paradoxically, the challenge of customization may be the solution for declining revenues. From what we saw last week in Florida, the ETF ecosystem remains at the cutting edge and is embracing innovation, growth, and enhanced investor experience.
Source of KPIs: Toroso Investments Security Master, as of February 19, 2019
|Pacific Global US Dividend Yield ETF||USDY|
TETF INDEX PERFORMANCE DATA
Returns as of February 19, 2019.
Inception Date: April 4, 2017. Index performance is for informational purposes only and does not represent the ETF.
Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
Past performance is NOT indicative of future results, which can vary.
TETF INDEX PERFORMANCE VS LEADING FINANCIAL INDEXES
As of February 19, 2019.
TOP 10 HOLDINGS PERFORMANCE
BOTTOM 10 HOLDINGS PERFORMANCE
As of February 11, 2019. Source: Morningstar Direct.